Physical rights are retained by the institution. Copyright is retained in accordance with U. S. Copyright laws.
Description
Dr. Gary T. Henry (University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill) discusses his point of view in the debate for what counts as credible evidence in evaluation and applied research, arguing that credibility is too subjective a factor to place trust in. This talk focuses on the too-easy ability for researchers to insert their own desires into their methods in order to achieve credible results. Potential alternatives are also discussed, especially work that recognizes and moves beyond methodological arguments to get at deeper issues in evaluation studies.
Psychology, Applied Evaluation Social sciences Credible Evidence
Source
Original video: 60 minute digital 8mm cassette; Tape 3; recorded symposium presentation entitled, “When Credibility is Not Enough: What to do When Getting it Right Matters,” from the symposium entitled, “What Constitutes Credible Evidence in Evaluation and Applied Research,” on August 19, 2006
If you're wondering about permissions and what you can do with this item, a good starting point is the "rights information" on this page. See our terms of use for more tips.
Share your story
Has Calisphere helped you advance your research, complete a project, or find something meaningful? We'd love to hear about it; please send us a message.
